﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Docket Activity</title>
    <description>Court case docket activity and events</description>
    <link>http://www.cadcourt.com/NewsFeed/tabid/53/BlogId/3/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <managingEditor>owenw@manusoft.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>admin@adskvoda.com</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:09:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:09:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 3.4.0.39853</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Autodesk Wins Round 2</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It's ostensibly just a small skirmish on the flank, but one can't help but be morbidly fascinated after reading the &lt;a href="http://www.cadcourt.com/Docket/209mc00096.aspx"&gt;docket history&lt;/a&gt; of the battle between Autodesk and Open Design Alliance that took place in a Phoenix court this month. Autodesk essentially got what they wanted, and in the end ODA isn't much worse off than when they started - but there is a lot of drama packed into this short detour.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One can sense pandemonium in the ODA camp as court ordered deadlines loomed. On September 15, they submitted documents with missing attachments, then resubmitted with one correct and one incorrect attachment, then finally resubmitted again, only to get their wrists slapped for filing documents that they did not have permission to file in the first place. One wonders if the outcome might have been different were it not for "the abusive length of the motion for protective order" that the judge poignantly derides in his order.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.cadcourt.com/NewsFeed/tabid/53/EntryID/75/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>owenw@manusoft.com</author>
      <comments>http://www.cadcourt.com/NewsFeed/tabid/53/EntryID/75/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cadcourt.com/Default.aspx?tabid=53&amp;EntryID=75</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.cadcourt.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=75</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>