﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Docket Activity</title>
    <description>Court case docket activity and events</description>
    <link>http://www.cadcourt.com/NewsFeed/tabid/53/BlogId/3/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <managingEditor>owenw@manusoft.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>admin@adskvoda.com</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:46:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:46:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 3.4.0.39853</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Autodesk Amends Complaint</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Autodesk has filed an &lt;a href="http://www.cadcourt.com/Docket/308cv04397.aspx?Event=144#Doc37"&gt;amended complaint&lt;/a&gt; against SolidWorks. The amended complaint is an attempt to address the problems identified by the &lt;a href="http://www.cadcourt.com/Docket/308cv04397.aspx?Event=136#Doc29"&gt;recent order&lt;/a&gt; on SolidWorks' motion to dismiss. Autodesk has substantially rewritten many parts of the complaint. The trade dress infringement claims have been narrowed, but they still appear to lack clear definition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.cadcourt.com/NewsFeed/tabid/53/EntryID/65/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>owenw@manusoft.com</author>
      <comments>http://www.cadcourt.com/NewsFeed/tabid/53/EntryID/65/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cadcourt.com/Default.aspx?tabid=53&amp;EntryID=65</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.cadcourt.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=65</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>