﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Docket Activity</title>
    <description>Court case docket activity and events</description>
    <link>http://www.cadcourt.com/NewsFeed/tabid/53/BlogId/3/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <managingEditor>owenw@manusoft.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>admin@adskvoda.com</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:56:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 3.4.0.39853</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Autodesk, SolidWorks Lawyers Working Overtime</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In a recent &lt;a href="http://www.cadcourt.com/Docket/308cv04397.aspx?Event=123#Doc16"&gt;flurry of filings&lt;/a&gt;, Autodesk attacks SolidWorks' motion to dismiss charges, and SolidWorks counters. The legal soap opera reads like a "he said, she said" schoolyard argument, except with more at stake. In my reading of the documents, I felt that Autodesk spent a lot of time straining at gnats in the weaker parts of its argument (perhaps intent on maximizing the defense costs -- unlike its approach in the Vernor case, where it chose to settle its weakest arguments). So far, SolidWorks appears to be up to the challenge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing that struck me is that Autodesk still refuses to state what exactly is false in SolidWorks' advertising claims. One might read into Autodesk's failure to address this and a few other specific challenges raised by SolidWorks that they are not primarily interested in making the judge's job easier. It will be interesting to see how the judge reacts to this apparent haughtiness.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.cadcourt.com/NewsFeed/tabid/53/EntryID/63/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>owenw@manusoft.com</author>
      <comments>http://www.cadcourt.com/NewsFeed/tabid/53/EntryID/63/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cadcourt.com/Default.aspx?tabid=53&amp;EntryID=63</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.cadcourt.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=63</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>